states

Georgia

92 Extreme Risk
Georgia
Electoral Votes
16
2020 Margin1
0.2%
State Legislature Control2
R
Voter Suppression and Election Interference Bills3
40
State Senate GOP Share
58.9%
State House GOP Share
56.1%
State Senate GOP Skew
9.7%
State House GOP Skew
6.9%

Georgia has an ISLT score of 92, which means it has an extreme risk of a Republican-led state legislature passing legislation to swing the state’s 2024 electoral votes toward the Republican presidential nominee. 

Georgia’s margin of victory in the last presidential contest was 0.2%, making it the closest contest. The margin of victory in the state matters because states with the closest margins of victories are more likely to flip as a result of voter suppression bills and other tactics that could be unleashed by a rogue, unaccountable state legislature. 

Currently, the state legislature is controlled by the Republican Party. The partisan control of the state legislature is included because Republican operatives supported and carried out an insurrectionist coup to undermine democracy in the last election, and have demonstrated a desire to overturn democratic election outcomes if necessary in order to gain power. Republicans control 56.1% of the Georgia House and 58.9% of the Georgia Senate, which indicates that Republicans have a considerable majority to enact future legislation that could interfere with the 2024 election. We also compared the partisan control of the state legislature to the state’s 2020 presidential results, and found that Republicans control 6.9% more state house seats than expected and 9.7% more state senate seats than expected. This skew toward the GOP indicates that the state legislature, which could be empowered to enact radical federal election law changes under ISLT, may well be insulated from being held accountable by voters.

Georgia’s legislature introduced at least 40 bills during 2021 and 2022 that would suppress votes or interfere with election administration. Around a quarter of Republicans in the last Georgia state legislature — 23% — took concrete steps to overturn or discredit the 2020 presidential election results.4

Additional Considerations

2020 Swing State

Georgia flipped from red to blue in the 2020 presidential election. Because the state was among the five Biden flipped in his pathway to victory, it is especially vulnerable to election interference attempts.

State Supreme Courts

Georgia selects Supreme Court judges through nonpartisan elections.5 Under a maximalist version of ISLT, the state Supreme Court would be unable to review or strike down any federal election-related changes the state legislature enacted. State legislatures could enact radical changes without state courts or the state constitution checking their authoritarian power. For this reason, the Conference of Chief Justices — which represents chief justices of both parties in all 50 states, took the rare step of filing an amicus brief opposing ISLT.

1 2020 presidential election data sourced from “2020 Presidential Election Results” Interactive Map, New York Times.
2 2022 midterm election data sourced from “Georgia Election Results 2022 Midterms,” The New York Times, and “Demetrius Rucker,” Ballotpedia.
3 State legislation data sourced from “Comprehensive Bill Tracker,” Voting Rights Lab (accessed Nov. 7, 2022).
4 Nick Corasaniti, Karen Yourish, and Keith Collins, “How Trump’s 2020 Election Lies Have Gripped State Legislatures,” The New York Times (May 22, 2022). 
5 “Georgia Supreme Court,” Ballotpedia.

Previous

Next